On this Thanksgiving Day, I wish not to write words myself, but to post George Washington’s Thanksgiving Day proclamation he gave in 1789. Enjoy and happy turkey day, G-d bless you and yours.
If I was that delicious, I would strut my stuff too
Whereas it is the duty of all Nations to acknowledge the providence of almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore his protection and favor – and Whereas both Houses of Congress have by their joint Committee requested me “to recommend to the People of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness.
Now therefore I do recommend and assign Thursday the 26th day of November next to be devoted by the People of these States to the service of that great and glorious Being, who is the beneficent Author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be – That we may then all unite in rendering unto him our sincere and humble thanks – for his kind care and protection of the People of this country previous to their becoming a Nation – for the signal and manifold mercies, and the favorable interpositions of his providence, which we experienced in the course and conclusion of the late war – for the great degree of tranquility, union, and plenty, which we have since enjoyed – for the peaceable and rational manner in which we have been enabled to establish constitutions of government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national One now lately instituted, for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed, and the means we have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge; and in general for all the great and various favors which he hath been pleased to confer upon us.
And also that we may then unite in most humbly offering our prayers and supplications to the great Lord and Ruler of Nations and beseech him to pardon our national and other transgressions – to enable us all, whether in public or private stations, to perform our several and relative duties properly and punctually – to render our national government a blessing to all the People, by constantly being a government of wise, just, and constitutional laws, discreetly and faithfully executed and obeyed – to protect and guide all Sovereigns and Nations (especially such as have shewn kindness unto us) and to bless them with good government, peace, and concord – To promote the knowledge and practice of true religion and virtue, and the increase of science among them and Us – and generally to grant unto all mankind such a degree of temporal prosperity as he alone knows to be best.
Given under my hand at the City of New York the third day of October in the year of our Lord 1789.
Since Sarah Palin was announced by old man river as the Vice Presidential candidate, the media has had a love affair with hating on her. While I could sit here and write an 8,000 word article on the instances when the media has hated on her, I will only site one (right now) of a recent article that caught my eye and disdain.
Enter Sally Quinn, a self professed atheist who coincidentally co-writes a crappy column for the Washington Post called On Faith. Sure, it makes a lot of sense that an avowed atheist with an obvious lack of knowledge on religion writes an article about religion. That would be like me penning a weekly article about how to run a large company that sells farm supplies and automobile transmissions.
Quinn, became an atheist at the ripe age of 13 says that Jon Meacham (who?) told her that religion is not something to be “dismissed or disdained.”
So why is it that Quinn devotes an entire article judging and dismissing Palin’s Christian faith? As a self-taught Apologist, I find it especially irking and annoying when someone who has no knowledge whatsoever about religion, fancies themselves experts. It is especially hard to find an atheist who can tell you anything at all about Christianity. I am not saying that all atheists are ignorant on things pertaining to religion, but they are certainly not authorities on the matter.
However, this is none to surprising as the MSM has always had it in for Christianity and Palin so it seems fitting that an idiot such as Quinn would write a blog about both.
Quinn starts off by mentioning when Palin came to salvation in Christ:
In her new book Sarah Palin writes that one summer at Bible Camp she “put my life in my creator’s hands and trust Him as I sought my life’s path.” For Palin, this grand divine plan was “a natural progression.” She writes. And later, “I don’t believe in coincidences.”
Then Quinn continues by asking rhetorical and asinine questions that show just how arrogant and unapprised she is.
What does she believe is God’s plan for her? Does she have any free will or is everything preordained. Can she see something coming and change her mind despite God’s plans for her?
Can Quinn be any dumber? Is Quinn trying desperately to fill in space in an article devoid of intelligence or substance? Does Quinn expect her readers to believe that she is an authoritative source on Christianity or any religion for that matter? Will the Longhorns lose, thusly allowing TCU to go to the national title game they so richly deserve?
Pictured: Sally Quinn no doubt giving a speech about something she has no knowledge of.
If Quinn truly knew anything about Christianity, these questions she asked are questions she could have answered herself. She continues:
Did God plan for her to become Governor of Alaska. If so, did God plan for her to step down. Did God plan for her to run for Vice President? If so why did she and McCain lose?
Let me answer these questions. Yes, yes, yes and ask McCain.
You would think that God would ask of her to live her life as an example to others of a compassionate loving, caring person.
I guess Quinn skipped the part in the Bible where G-d said “My ways are not your ways, my thoughts are not your thought”
“You would think that God…”
Is she really that dumb? Those 5 words show what little knowledge she truly as. Even in Quinn’s min-bio she states
“I don’t have any idea who or what God is. But the closest explanation I’ve heard … is … ‘When two people relate to each other authentically and humanly, God is that electricity that surges between them.’”
That would almost be poetic if it wasn’t obvious that’s exactly what she was aiming for. But the important part in this is “I don’t have any idea who or what God is.”
In saying this, she tells us that she has no room to judge Sarah Palin when it comes to theology because she as admitting her lack of knowledge.
So is Quinn attacking Palin because of her theological beliefs or her conservative ideals? I think it’s painfully obvious that Quinn dislikes Palin and is simply reaching to find something to complain about when it comes to her. She is just reaching and searching for something to condemn Palin about. This article she wrote won’t have any intelligent person shouting at their computer screen “Yep, you’re right about that Quinn! Yep, you go girl!” because everyone who reads this will come away with a bad taste in their mouth. Quinn comes off as an arrogant, contemptuous, despicable, hate-filled idiot with nothing better to do than write a fundamentally-flawed article about something she knows nothing about!
The North American Idiot in its natural habitat
David Limbaugh said something about Sarah Palin that I can’t help but to agree with because it oozes of truth.
“You can’t watch Sarah Palin in action or in interviews without recognizing her genuineness, her graciousness, her kindness and her authentic Christian spirit.”
I don’t think any unbiased individual can watch Palin and not agree with that statement.
Thanks for reading, make sure to friend my awesomeness on facebook by searching for “Von Paxton” so you may get updates when I post a new blog. Please feel free to comment and help a brother out and spread the word. Thanks again!
Harry Reid’s version of the health care bill is out and it is even longer than Pelosi-care. It comes in at 2,074 pages and is longer than “War & Peace” and has 5 times more words than the Torah.
Senator Tom Coburn has requested that the bill get read in its entirety in front of the Senate before debate begins. Coburn plans to invoke a parliamentary rule that requires it be read to the full Senate. This rule states that any senator can demand that any bill be read to the senate before its passing or not passing.
In senate rule XIV (paragraph 2) states that every bill and joint resolution “shall receive three readings prior to its passage.”
This is Tom Coburn. His request to have the bill read MADE me very very happy. but he has since backed off his request. Just like a politician...
According to the Washington times, if the bill took 1 minute a page to read, it would take 34.5 hours.
Republican leadership says that with occasional pauses and sips of water along the way, it would take 48 to 54 hours. And you can multiply that by 3 if the Republicans senators so choose.
UPDATE: Tom Coburn is being a nancy and has decided to back off on his request to have the bill read. Yet another instance of a Republican politician making a hollow threat. This is very disappointing because having the bill read to the senate might have done some good to get votes against the bill.
The bill has been posted online and you can take a look at the address below. I would suggest reading the whole thing if you need a Tylenol pm replacement.
David F. Hamilton, who is he? More importantly, why should you care who he is? I will tell you. Hamilton is currently awaiting an up-or-down vote from the senate to serve on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Barack Obama nominated him and had this to say about Hamilton:
“Judge Hamilton has a long and impressive record of service and a history of handing down fair and judicious decisions,” He continued ”He will be a thoughtful and distinguished addition to the 7th Circuit.”
That’s cool
Let’s look at Hamilton’s record shall we?
I couldn’t find a picture of him that was labeled for reuse so here is a picture of a polar bear taking a nap on a rock next to a tire…
That looks like one comfortable rock...
What kind of a guy would say that the role of a judge includes “writing footnotes to the Constitution”? Delicious.
His career began as a fundraiser for a group called Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now in 1979. And you’re all like “So?” well that group is better known by “ACORN” you heard of em?
He once ruled that pornographic video stores could operate near churches a decision that went against Indiana statute. According to Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Hamilton had “blocked enforcement of an Indiana law that barred the sale or display of sexually explicit material within 500 feet of church or school.”
In this case, Hamilton sided with the video store owner saying that censoring the pornographic video store would “survive First Amendment scrutiny” Hamilton also wrote that “At this early stage in this lawsuit, the state has not met this evidentiary standard,” granting the store license to operate within 500 feet from a church.
In Hinrichs v. Bosma the plaintiff Anthony Hinrichs alleged that speaker of the Indiana House Brian Bosma, violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment because Bosma invoked the name of Jesus Christ in his prayers opening house sessions.
Hamilton ordered Bosma not to invoke “Christ’s name or title” in house prayers. Former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich said that Hamilton ruled that “saying the words Jesus Christ in a prayer is a sign of inappropriate behavior, but saying Allah would be OK.”
Why did Newt say this? Because Hamilton only ruled that invoking Christ was wrong but mentioned no other religion. Instead of barring all religion from the House, he barred only Christianity. When asked, Hamilton said that “This record, however, shows no efforts by Jewish or Muslim clerics to use the prayer opportunity to advance their particular religions,” He continued, “At this juncture there is no need to be more specific in the injunction as to what would amount to a sectarian prayer in those traditions.”
So that translates to “Until someone else complains, I don’t really care and probably won’t even if they do for fear of offending others.”
Brian Bosma said of the decision “I am shocked and dismayed by the Court’s decision today. I find the Court’s unprecedented decision disturbing in that it directs me, as Speaker, to advise people that they are prohibited from using “Christ’s name or title or any other denominational appeal”
When I think “Indiana” I think Peyton Manning. Here is a picture of him in an orange shirt, pointing at something. or is his shirt "Creamsical"?
In A Woman’s Choice-East Side Women’s Clinic v. Newman, an abortion clinic challenged Indiana Public Law 187 which required “women to be given information about the procedure and other alternatives to abortion, in person, 18 hours before an abortion is performed.” (Quote courtesy of CNSNews.com)
Hamilton issued an injunction saying in his opinion the law caused“unconstitutional burden on a woman’s right to choose to have an abortion.” He also said “As a practical matter, that provision requires the vast majority of women seeking an abortion to make two trips to an abortion clinic,”
Heaven forbid someone who is about to murder a child has to make 2 whole visits. NO!!!!!!
“For many women that requirement would make abortion more expensive and less convenient,”
Yea cause that’s what we want, murder to be more convenient.
Thankfully, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals overturned his asinine decision.
In 2008, Hamilton ruled to strike a law that would require convicted sex offenders to release personal information like email addresses and internet screen-names and to submit to routine search warrants…
He once denied a Rabbi from displaying a Menorah from a holiday display in Indianapolis. The court of appeals rebuked Hamilton on this decision.
This is exactly the kind of person that we want nominated. Someone who’s biggest decisions were overturned because they were ridiculous and unfounded. Even the left-leaning American Bar Association said he was “not qualified” for his position.
Former Attorney General Edwin Meese said in a memo that Hamilton’s “record demonstrates that he would decide cases on the basis of his politics and personal agenda instead of the Constitution.” He also said “is precisely the kind of liberal judicial activist who would use our federal courts as his own super-legislature. The Senate should vote no on the cloture vote to stop this nomination.”
It’s no surprise that BO would nominate such an idiot to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Given his track record he loves people such as Hamilton who use their political beliefs to push their rulings on the bench. Let’s look at BO’s quote again:
“Judge Hamilton has a long and impressive record of service and a history of handing down fair and judicious decisions,” He continued ”He will be a thoughtful and distinguished addition to the 7th Circuit.”
Do you concur with that statement? Or is this just another instance of BO talking without having any prior knowledge on the topic? BO says he is a Christian, does he want a porn shop mere feet from where he attends service? Does he think it’s wrong to invoke Christ’s name in a prayer? Does he think it’s wrong for a woman to get the facts and given other ways out instead of rushing to an abortion? Either he agrees with all of Hamilton’s ridiculous decisions or he is once again talking out his head about something he doesn’t know anything about, yet claims to have all the facts and knowledge.
Either way, Hamilton is a liberal scum-bag and has no place being a judge anywhere, let alone the court of appeals. A judge is not in a position of authority to push his agendas and ideologies; he is there to be an impartial arbitrator which Hamilton is not. Let’s pray (In Christ’s name!) that he does not make it to the court of appeals.
Thanks for stopping by, make sure to comment and tell your friends how awesome I am or how bad I am. Add me on facebook so you can get updates on my new blog posts. Type “Von Paxton” in the search thingy on facebook and get you some. Good day
Let me start out by saying that I greatly dislike Barack Obama. I know you’re all like “huh?”
It’s true, and if you are somebody who follows my writings then this isn’t a surprise to you. But let me also say this, he is the President which means he is my President. I find it highly ignorant when I see bumper stickers that say “Obama is not my President” because the very same cats who have those bumper sticker were scoffing at people who had the same bumper stickers except with G-Dub’s name.
I tell you these things because even though I dislike him greatly, he is my President and my President should not bow to anyone. No one on this planet deserves a bow from the American President. And if Obama is truly a Christian as he says he is, then he should doubly not bow to anyone human being. Sure, if you are an idiot you can say it’s a sign of respect. Yes, in Asian circles, people bow to each other as a sign of respect. Yea maybe he was in Japan but that doesn’t mean he needs to roll how they roll cause he is still representing American regardless of where he is in the world. It’s almost as if he is saying that all of America bows to Japan.
I am fairly certain that Asians bow at the same time. Now look at the picture below and tell me if they are bowing at the same time out of respect for each other:
As you see, Obama is bowing down really far as Japan’s emperor smiles like an idiot. Then there was this one.
Our country was founded on a disdain for all things royalty. Our political system was created so that our leaders would not be there because of birth right. The U.S. President should bow to no man not even royalty. You know why? Just because these other countries have “emperors” and “Kings” does not mean the President has to follow the same customs as the poor peasants in those countries. You can be respectful and dignified without bowing like a moron.
This comes as no surprise from someone who thinks America sucks but you would hope his massive ego would at least come into play. This is an instance when I would be fine with him thinking he is awesome. If only he would think to himself “I am the President of the greatest country on earth. I am the leader of the free world, I bow to no man” we wouldn’t be talking about this. I’ll tell you this right now, I’m not the President (yet) but I am a Christian man and as a Christian, I have never and will never bow to a man. Customs be damned.
Again I have to make a comparison to G-Dub. G-Dub carried himself with dignity and never bowed to any foreign leader. And if he did? The same liberals who are currently saying “this isn’t a big deal you crazy republicans” would be tearing G-Dub to pieces. It’s almost like BO doesn’t think. He doesn’t use his brain, this is beyond dumb. What was he thinking? No American President has bowed to Royalty or any foreign leader until now.
Franklin Roosevelt once hosted the King and Queen of England on a visit to the U.S. Roosevelt did not bow to them, he did not show subservience. British journalist Alistair Cooke detailed:
“Roosevelt took them [the Royal couple] off to Hyde Park [his Hudson River estate] and drove his own hand-run automobile into the grounds and gave them a hot dog lunch. Well, this was a shocker to the British, but it’s the thing he would do. You see, he was a natural aristocrat, Roosevelt was. He didn’t have to put on airs.”
That was an example that I like a lot because it shows the American President says “Welcome to America where we are all equals, let’s get a hot dog….I’ll drive”
Man a hot dog sounds good right now. Needs catsup and little tiny onions though. Hebrew National only please...
Here is what Daniel Ruddy of Newsmax.com says:
Roosevelt was also an American through and through and secure in his standing as a world leader.
There is a lesson here for President Obama, who appears intent on upending more than two centuries of American protocol. When he as president bows before a Saudi king or a Japanese emperor, he is sending an implicit message to millions of people around the world that the leader of the free world accepts the notion that some people are born to a higher rank than others.
Today’s ADD moment is brought to you by this cute Meerkat:
This Meerkat knows how to keep it real
Check out what an Obama aide said about the King Abdullah bow.
“It wasn’t a bow. He grasped his hand with two hands, and he’s taller than King Abdullah,”
That’s ricockulous. I am 6 foot 2 inches tall and have never had to bow to shake hands with someone shorter than me. Way to rapid fire a crappy excuse dummy.
I will say it again, Obama is my President he is the American President and leader of the free world, and he bows to no man regardless of their title. No man on earth is worthy of a bow from the leader of the free world. Not until Christ comes back to take us home.
Good day as always I thank you for stopping by. Please feel free to leave a comment as I value your thoughts and opinions and I guarantee a response. Make sure to spread the word and add me on Facebook so you can get updates on when I post a new blog. Simply search “Von Paxton” and you will find me.
Let’s play a game, yea? It’s called, “Who said this crap?” I will give you a quote and you tell me by yelling at your computer screen, the answer. You ready? Whatever…
Who Said This Crap? Number 1:
“You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them,” they said “And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”
I’ll give you a second to answer as if this is a video or I can control how fast you read the rest…
“You wished you reeked of awesomeness like my boy Barracks does…..I mean, I said, Barack!” man Biden is a dummy
If you answered Barack Obama, then you are correct. I am thoroughly impressed with your intellect and your guile. You lay honor upon your family name, your family should be proud of you but most importantly, your Uncle Von is proud of you. Do you feel good? Happy that I treat you so well? Well then you should tell all your friends to read my blog. I digress…
Who Said This Crap? Number 2:
“In America, there’s a failure to appreciate Europe’s leading role in the world. Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive.”
So who said it, smarty pants? If you said Barack Obama, I again am highly impressed. You should probably be writing your own blog with a brain like that… actually, don’t, I don’t like competition.
“You!!! Do you dare challenge me as the king of complete and utter awesomenessocity?! What do you mean that’s not a word? If Barack says it’s a word, it’s a word. You get the initials P.O.T.U.S and come talk to me! Haha! Barack!”
Let’s try another.
Who Said This Crap? Number 3:
“I also believe that all too often our government made decisions based on fear rather than foresight; that all too often our government trimmed facts and evidence to fit ideological predispositions. Instead of strategically applying our power and our principles, too often we set those principles aside as luxuries that we could no longer afford.”
I’m fairly certain by this point that you know who this is. Its BO once again telling other people that America sucks. Not only does he tell these other jokers that America sucks but he apologizes for it. He also basically said in these speeches that he is awesome and everything in the world will be all good now that he is ruining….err… I mean running America’s Executive branch.
BO will soon be in Japan, the Japanese government has offered for him to visit Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He has since declined the offer sighting a busy schedule but he has promised to visit it while still in office, something no sitting president has ever done. You may think it would be hard for me to criticize BO for something he hasn’t said yet in place he hasn’t visited yet. But I have showed you exhibits A, B and C which are the quotes above. These are just a few of many quotes BO has used to emasculate America. I’m sure if he went to either Hiroshima or Nagasaki, he would tell the Japanese how crappy he thinks we are and how sorry he is that this happened. He won’t say that it was a necessary event to end the bloodiest war in history. This would just be another opportunity for him to go abroad and tell other countries that he doesn’t like us either.
So if I have my numbers correctly, BO has promised to visit the site of a brutal (albeit, necessary) bombing site(s). Yet he deems the 20th anniversary of one of the most positive events in the last 50 years unworthy of his presence. I am of course talking about the anniversary of the fall of the Berlin wall.
The wall coming down was a great event in the fall of a soviet empire and freedom in general. Who had a large hand in this? America did, Ronald Reagan did. I’m sure you have seen or heard this famous speech. This isn’t the whole thing but it’s the most famous part.
BO decided this event was unworthy, but thank G-d, he made a video to show us. I’m not gonna put you through it but he fails to mention Ronald Reagan even once. Not a single mention of Reagan’s name, not a mention of Reagan’s legacy, not a mention of the good that Reagan did to help bring down the wall. This isn’t that surprising, BO cant step up to a level that would give props to a great Conservative leader. No love whatsoever because Reagan wasn’t a progressive, wasn’t a statist. Because Reagan is a symbol for Conservativism, BO couldn’t even utter his name. You think Berlin Wall falling, you think Reagan, and you think of those words he spoke “Tear down this wall!”
But BO couldn’t resist touting himself as awesome in his speech from the comfort of the White House.
“Few would have foreseen … that a united Germany would be led by a woman from Brandenburg or that their American ally would be led by a man of African descent. But human destiny is what human beings make of it.”
Yea we get it, you’re awesome and everyone else sucks. His arrogance knows no bounds; he said he would be a transparent president and it is painfully obvious how transparent he really is, he is showing us all what he really is. Maybe he should re-think that transparency stuff.
Good day. Make sure to leave a comment with some love or some hate.
In this quick hit, I’m going to lead off with the conclusion.
In conclusion, Jane Fonda is still an idiot after all these years.
That’s a correct conclusion. So why do I call Jane “traitor” Fonda an idiot? Because she made the following quote:
“Every dictator—Stalin, Ceaucescu, Hilter—has made anti-choice a central component of their agenda. The anti-choice movement has used different strategies over the decades, growing more strategic and virulent in reaction to the modern U.S. women’s movement.”
Huh? That’s interesting that Hitler was pro-life. Wanna know why that’s interesting? Guess he wasn’t.
Huh?
Yea I said it! When Hitler came to power, he legalized abortion. It is estimated that 500,000 abortions were conducted annually under Hitler’s wing. In fact, some races that Hitler considered “un-desirable” were forced to have abortions.
It’s true; Stalin did ban abortion but was it because he didn’t want babies to be murdered before they were given a chance at life? No, Stalin was a socialist remember so he made abortion illegal so that he would have more workers once they came of age.
If I were Jane Fonda, I would cry too. Being an idiot isn't as easy as she makes it look
It’s cute that Fonda calls Pro-Life people “Anti-Choice” as if to say that Pro-Lifers hate freedom and don’t want people to be able to choose anything. This coming from a person who subscribes to a party that wants more government control and more regulations and government intervention. The word “choice” was given to pro-abortionist to empower women and their cause to commit legal murder. Just like a liberal to use words (albeit small ones) to twist things around and make others look like evil people who hate choice and love power.
She actually says in her rambling, ridiculous blog that pro-lifers are only pro-life because they want power.
Huh?
Yea that makes sense; pro-lifers only want abortion to be illegal because it makes them feel powerful. How long did it take you to pull that theory out your toilet, Jane? This traitorous swine shouldn’t be allowed to be within the walls of this country and here she is blabbing things and claiming facts that are simply inaccurate. Yea, let’s paint anti-abortionists as the bad guys. Hey Jane, this isn’t about women’s empowerment, this isn’t about women’s lib, and this isn’t about you feeling smart because you wrote an inaccurate blog. It’s about the life of an unborn child. This is the biggest genocide in human history and apparently it’s all about women feeling liberated and in charge. “This is about my body mister!” No it isn’t! Jane, you were a moron back in the 70’s when you hung out with America’s enemy while America was at war with said enemy. And you are still a moron today.
Here’s one last quote by Jane Fonda:
“Telling lies and showing off to get attention are mistakes I made that I don’t want my kids to make.”
Not only have you made those mistakes, but you continue to make em to this day. I guess that quote was a lie too. Weird
First of all, I want to let you know that I am a conservative. I know, you’re all like “huh?” it’s true that’s what I am. I am not a republican, I am a conservative there is a difference…
And throughout my blogs I have given some reasons as to why I am a conservative. They have mostly been along the lines of “I’m for small government” “I’m for the free-market” “I’m for what the founding fathers and the constitution have given us”
Now I want you to understand this; I am not a closed minded individual. I will not only vote for people with a “C” or and “R” next to their name. If I believe someone from a different party intends on shrinking federal government, increasing personal freedoms and the like then I will vote for them. It is true. Now you’re asking “What’s your point, stupid?”
I’d appreciate it if you kept the insults to yourself, but my point follows.
I will be talking about Barack Obama. Understand this, my friend; I am going to talk about him not as a conservative but as a human who sees brosef for what he truly is. And I will tell you what he truly is.
When he was on the election trail, he made very few mistakes. He was very careful, he was eloquent, he was charismatic, and he promised the friggin moon to you. He stood up as a Senator with very little experience at all. He said he would not bring politics as usual to D.C. what has he done? Just that.
He spoke from his podiums in front of mesmerized sheep that ate out of the palm of his hand as if he was the redeemer in the flesh. The people jumped on his bandwagon and proclaimed that this guy was who he says he was, that he would indeed do as he said he would do.
Everyone loved him: black, white, purple, silver, aqua-maroon, Jews, Catholics, little people, circus clowns, Elvis impersonators, republicans, liberals, independents, old, young, middle-aged, hell even dead people loved him.
So why are people, a year from the election having voter’s remorse? Because he is showing us who he is, who some people knew he was the whole time.
So why did he win? Because voters didn’t do their research, because he is young and charismatic. Because the young voters are to inept and lazy to actually do some research as opposed to seeing a guy who eloquent and promised the moon and the stars and believed him. Because he wasn’t G-Dub. Because he smelled of fresh cut grass on a spring morning.
Freshly cut grass......
I believe he won the election because the vast majority of the people who voted for him didn’t care about his policies. Didn’t care about his vision, wasn’t willing to listen to learn. They just wanted someone who wasn’t G-Dub and wasn’t 80. The voters didn’t get off their butt to dig deeper, they weren’t willing to do some foot work because they probably weren’t that concerned about what would come of this. A lot of young voters turned out to vote and as I said, college kids and 20-somethings aren’t invested enough to vote for someone they agree with on the issues. Because they don’t care enough to know what the issues are and what the presidential candidates stand for. Obama was covered heavily by the drooling media and crammed down our throats and America loved every second of it.
So who is he really? He is a under qualified, hypersensitive, spineless, courage less, insensible, pompous, statist snob who is in way over his head.
Why is he under qualified? Well I wouldn’t consider 4 years in Illinois senate and 4 years in the U.S. senate doesn’t exactly qualify for the highest seat in all the land. Governors are more qualified than him. Out of the last 5 presidents, 4 were governors at one time. The only one that wasn’t was George H. W. Bush who had prior foreign policy experience by serving as director of the CIA, Ambassador to U.N. and Vice President under Reagan.
Having been a community organizers, civil rights lawyer and senator for four years does not make you qualified to be President.
Why is hypersensitive? Because he has been hailed as the messiah for so long that he isn’t used to being criticized. His supporters and advisors hang on his every word and kiss his feet as they lay down roses ahead of him as he walks. So what happens when someone speaks out against him? He singles them out by name and network affiliation and openly mocks them. No president that I can remember would was their time on such pettiness. He has more on his plate than Rosie O’Donnell with a tapeworm on thanksgiving. Yet he stoops to Olbermann levels by complaining and whining about everyone who is critical of his asinine policies. It’s of course impart to America eating out of the palm of his hand on the campaign trail, but I’m sure the sycophants in his inner circle kiss his bum like some kind of puppies wanting only to please their master. I imagine them fawning over his every word as if Christ himself were preaching the way to salvation.
"Bahhhh"
He is so thin-skinned that it’s sickening, what kind of President addresses his critics any chance he can? Such squabbles are beneath a man in such a high office. Give me a man-sized break over here.
Why is he spineless unt (that means ‘and’) courage less? He has spoken out several times against friend but never foe. Take Iran for example. During their obvious rigged elections and murder and arrest of outspoken opposition toMahmoud Ahmadinejad (aka midget aka Alphabet) Obama was silent. Not a word, not condemning the attacks, not condemning the elections, nothing.
“It’s true, I did steal that election and I would have gotten away with it if it was for you meddling kids” that’s a really bad joke and I’m sorry.
However, when sovereign nation and friend to America, Israel built settlements to house a growing Israeli population, BO was very vocal. Condemning the attacks from Jump Street, Obama had this to say:
“we continue to emphasize that America does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements,”
If I was Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu I would tell BO “I don’t give a steaming hot damn what you recognize as legitimate.” Israel is surrounded on all sides by enemies and has very little friends in the world (what with the growing global anti-Semitism and all) and here some America who is supposed to be Israel’s greatest friend and what do they say? “We don’t want you building houses for your growing population”
But Iran’s radical leader straight steals an election, MURDERS protesters and what does the mighty messiah have to say? Oh yea, he says nothing. Why was BO silent? Because he is a frightened coward who wants to appease enemies while condemning friends. When Honduras’s communist, Chavez puppet “president” was overthrown, Obama spoke out against it.
I think I saw this guy in Dallas, notice the cowboy hat and obscenely black mustache.
He was overthrown because of his trying to abolish term limits, and his growing ties with communist leaders Hugo Chavez and Raul Castro. And him being overthrown “deeply concerned” Obama. Why? Because BO is afraid of Chavez. What else could it be? The man was shrinking freedoms in Honduras and he got removed from power. Why is that a bad thing?
“I am Hugo Chavez fascist leader of Venezuela. Stare in wonder at my obnoxious sash and giant, weird, silver star medallion.”
Why is he insensible? Following Ft Hoods tragedy, The White House was notified immediately about the tragic events. Instead of seeing a solemn President take to the podium to immediately address those lost, we saw a light-hearted clownsical (yea I made that word up) giving a “shout-out”.
Imagine those (such as I) who were following the news of the Ft Hood massacre and saw as the President took to the stage and immediately made remarks thanking his cabinet and then giving a shout-out. Imagine what Americans at home were thinking, here comes the President to speak about Ft Hood and he comes out and makes a light-hearted remark. After speaking about the conference and giving another empty promise, he suddenly shifts gears and talks about Ft Hood. Yet he spends more time talking about the investigation then he does acting as a sympathetic leader of a country. See for yourself:
How is he a pompous snob? Well I think his war with Fox news was proof enough as if he, Gibbs and Dunn were saying “how dare you speak out against me”. But I’m going to take it a step further by giving you health care reform as proof. Do you in all honesty believe that Obama wants healthcare free of charge because he cares so much about the poor? No way, it’s always been all about him and his legacy. Not President has passed universal health care before. That could be because it’s unconstitutional and socialist. But Obama is trying so hard to do so much in such a little amount of time because he wants to be remembered for how much good he has done. He wants to be touted as the first President to pass health care reform not because of his big heart, but because of his massive ego. Check out these bits from the e-mail he sent supporters after the health care vote in the house.
“Despite countless attempts over nearly a century, no chamber of Congress has ever before passed comprehensive health reform. This is history.”
TranslatVon- “Many people have tried for almost a century (a century equals 100 years for you folks that didn’t attend an elite college like Barack did) but they weren’t Barack fn Obama, you are witnessing history, Barack history.”
“Each “yes” vote was a brave stand”
TranslatVon- “Each ‘No’ vote was a bunch of haters who hate Americans and hate Barack (how is that possible?) And hate kittens and are stupid and Republicans and I hate them and their dumb Fox news”
“the old rules are changing — and the people will not be ignored.”
TranslatVon- “The rules are actually pretty much the same, but I like the word ‘change’…. The people will not be ignored if they agree with me, if they are the millions of tea party protestors and people who spoke up at town hall meetings I’m going to ignore those radical extremists.”
“Can you donate $25 or whatever you can afford so we can finish this fight?”
TranslatVon- “let me get your money, son”
“Please donate to Organizing for America’s campaign to win this fight and ensure that real health care reform reaches my desk by the end of this year.”
TranslatVon-“Seriously, let me get that money, any amount will help me cement my legacy as the most socialist president of all time. Only you can help make me a worse president than Jimmy “I hate Jews” Carter.”
I think you are catching my point. Obama is nothing more than a sniveling, whiney, frightened, pompous, obsequious (good word), out of touch, joker. He has harmed our relationship with friends while pushing statist agendas at a time when we need to increase America’s freedoms not destroy them. He is no were near qualified for the office he currently holds, he has shown no spine when dealing with our enemies. He has ignored the opinions of the American people, he has played nothing but partisan politics even though he promised there would be none. He has done more damage in less than a year than Clinton did in 4. He doesn’t represent us well in any fashion. While I feel all of this is true, he is still our President for at least another 3 years. Until then, I will be praying for a much needed and well deserved GOP resurgence.
Thanks for stopping by, make sure to comment and share your thoughts with me. A reply is guaranteed, until next time, good day.
You may be asking yourself, “What do liberals want? What do they yearn for?” Well thank G-d you are reading this cause I’m going to tell you! They want it all. All of it! You might now be asking, “What’s it?” well if you would just calm down a second, I’ll tell you. It is everything. If it’s something, they want it all. If it speaks, they wanna tell it what to say. If it has an odor, they want it to smell of liberalism. This smells just like B.O. and salmonella. And if you think salmonella doesn’t have a smell, then you are a buffoon!
But in all seriousness, the liberals/statists can never have enough. EVER!
Just look at how they complain about Fox news and Conservative talk radio. Before Fox News came about, every Mainstream Media (MSM) network was run by statists and leaned to their agenda. They loved them some Clinton, they hated them some Bush and now they love them some Obama. And now there are even more. We are talking CNN, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, PBS and ABC. And it’s not just limited to Television either. Look at the print media as well; we are talking The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Boston Globe, USA Today, Newsweek, Time, and Rolling Stone. Just to name a few.
"Talk about me now please! MEEEEE!!!!!!"
But Conservatives get one news channel that has several Right leaning opinion shows and that’s a problem? So what?! Can’t we have one friggin channel to call our own? No, that is too much to ask. The liberals want it all. But they can’t even swallow their pride and admit that these stations don’t just lean left, they law down left. For the most part, conservatives don’t mind admitting that Fox news leans right at times and so what? Who cares? The statists have the rest of the MSM and we get one and that’s too much? Of course it is because the statists want it all. They also hate the FACT that Fox news consistently dominates the ratings. Check it out folks:
Fox News averaged 2.25 million total viewers in prime time for the third quarter, up 2% over the previous year. That’s more than CNN (946,000, down 30%) and MSNBC (788,000, down 10%) combined.
The O’Reilly Factor” led all cable news programs with an average of 3.295 million total viewers for the quarter, up 12% over the previous year. “Hannity” (2.603 million, up 9%), “Glenn Beck” (2.403 million, up 89%), “On the Record with Greta van Susteren” (2.150 million, up 16%), and “Special Report with Bret Baier” (1.997 million, up 20%) rounded out the top five. “ –Huffington Post online
"3 new york times best sellers in 1 year and 89% growth in ratings after all this succes, I'm still Uncle Von's biggest fan"
The first 10 spots, as far as ratings are concerned, are all Fox News channel shows. In fact, The O’Reilly Factor, when shown as a repeat ranks higher than Olbermann, Maddow, Nancy Grace, Anderson Cooper, Lou Dobbs and Chris Matthews. Also, Fox News Channel’s show Red Eye (which I am a huge fan of) does just .2 less than Olbermann and is shown at 2 am. Olbermann’s show is in prime time!
The Statists are afraid of Fox News. Frightened I say! Because regular people are sick of the liberal spin. They go to Fox News to get the truth. They get more truth in Fox News opinion shows than they do any of CNN’s or MSNBC’s.
I digress.
Let’s look at the leaning of talk radio. Conservatives like Limbaugh, Hannity, Savage and Beck dominate the talk radio market. And that too is a fact. Limbaugh, Hannity and Savage regularly take the top three slots in ratings, in that order. So now you are asking “But why uncle? Why aren’t there more liberal radio talk show hosts?” Well I will answer those questions and it’s really rather simple.
Because no one wants to listen to that crap. It’s true, liberal talk-radio doesn’t thrive or exist in the magnitude that Conservative talk radio does because no one wants to hear it. Let’s be honest, if there was a craving, a need and demand for liberal talk radio, they would certainly be more prevalent. But liberal talk radio blows and we all know it. Bill Schulz from Red Eye has his own theory; he says Conservative talk radio is popular because Conservatives like to listen to it at work, whereas liberals don’t have jobs so they don’t listen to the radio. This could very well be true but it’s also true that liberal talk radio is garbled crap and doesn’t survive because no one cares for it.
The saddest part about this all is, the statists are so transparent in there double standards. They could bash G-Dub all day long but when someone see’s Obama for what he is, then proceeds to speak their mind, they are racists. For 8 years the liberal media and the soul-less, cowards in congress bashed our President, but we bash a socialist such as Obama and all of a sudden, we are racist and counterproductive. Liberals can protest and exercise free speech all they want, but when Conservative’s finally get off their butts and protest in the form of tea-parties, liberals react in a negative way. White house Adviser David Axelrod said the Tea Party movement is an “unhealthy” reaction to the nation’s current economic climate. Actress/Comedian (if you can call her that) Janeane “the best movie I was in was Mystery Men” Garofalo had this to say:
Let’s be very honest about what this is about,” she said on Keith Olbermann’s crap-tastic show. “It’s not about bashing Democrats. It’s not about taxes. They have no idea what the Boston Tea Party was about. They don’t know their history at all. This is about hating a black man in the White House. This is racism straight up. That is nothing but a bunch of tea-bagging rednecks.”
“I bought this outfit from a drunken hobo for 5 bucks…what a sucker. Don’t be fooled people, I may look alive but on the inside, I’m very much dead”
The most troubling thing about this is not that Garofalo fancies herself a political pundit. It’s not that she called Tea Party protestors “rednecks” and “racists”. And it’s not that she thinks people actually care about her stupid opinion. It’s that….she’s still alive. Seriously, who knew? Her career is about as lively as that squirrel I ran over with my minivan when I was in high school. I shouldn’t have said that, now PETA is gonna camp out in my front yard…
Again, I digress.
Nancy Pelosi suggests that these people (tea party protesters) aren’t smart enough or independent enough to organize these protests on their own. Calling the protests “Astroturf” and that it’s “funded by high end” Americans who are using these events “to keep focus on tax cuts for the rich”.
Anyone else think she looks like the Crypt Keeper from Tales from the Crypt? No amount of botox can save her now...
No way could this be about Obama and his attempt at making the government even bigger.
When liberals protested at military members FUNERALS that was fine, but G-d forbid they protest “the anointed one”. We are talking about protesting a dead American who voluntarily gave their life in defense of these scumbags. But that’s all well and good and within their rights, but a conservative protests and its racism. Liberals spent 8 years (and continue to this day) calling G-dub unending slurs and horrible names and that was all good but you disagree with “the Messiah” and that means you’re an ignorant moron from the sticks.
With a quick ADD moment, here’s a picture of a cute puppy for no reason:
Man thats one cute puppy....now keep reading
My point is this: all over the place we see double standards. The liberals don’t want the conservatives to have anything…at all. They can overwhelm the market with liberal Media on television and print but the conservatives have one channel that leans to the right and that’s unacceptable to them. They can’t accept that Conservatives on Fox News and on the radio are popular because of the message they deliver. People want to watch and listen to these shows. No one is forcing them, no one has a gun to their domes making them watch and listen. Liberal talk radio blows, that’s why they don’t exist. It’s not that they don’t exist because of some massive conspiracy; they don’t exist because no one cares for what they have to say. Liberal leaning newspapers, magazines, and TV channels are spread as far as the eye can see, but that isn’t enough. Liberals have been protesting since Vietnam and that was them simply “exercising their first amendment rights” but when average folk who want small government protest, it’s widely orchestrated by the rich and is made up of nothing but idiots, rednecks, and racists.
The double-standards of liberals can be seen in almost any political venue, it’s no surprise and it isn’t new. And they wonder why people are having voter’s remorse from last year’s election. In the words of Queen, the liberals are clearly saying “I want it all I want it all I want it all and I want it now”.
Good day. I care about your opinions, share them with me by leaving a comment. I guarantee I will respond to them. Thanks for stopping by, see you soon.
In America, if you have the scratch to purchase a business, a franchise, a hot dog cart; it is in your full right. Now let’s say you are a conservative talk show host who is Obama’s most vocal opponent, and you have the scratch to purchase a franchise, it is not your right. In fact, some will do all in their power to make sure that doesn’t happen. Who would try to stop you? WHO?!
Why, race-hustlers Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson of course! These two have a very serious track record for trying all they can to make race an issue. Their most recent race related incident involves Conservative talk-show host Rush Limbaugh. What? You’ve heard of him?
Rush Limbaugh was mentioned as a potential minority owner for the dreadful St. Louis Rams. Keep in mind that the St. Louis Rams were not even (and still aren’t) for sale. So what’s the problem Uncle Von? I’ll tell you the problem, He’s a Racist! A racist I say! He said such hateful things as this:
“I think the media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. They’re interested in black coaches and black quarterbacks doing well. I think there’s a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a lot of credit for the performance of his team that he really didn’t deserve.”
What?! How dare you sir! Oh wait….there wasn’t anything racist about that…
Let’s be honest here, is Donovan McNabb over-rated? Yes. Is it racist for a white guy to express his opinion that a black quarterback is over-rated? No.
Enter Demaurice Smith. Who is Demaurice Smith you ask? He is the Executive Director of the National Football League Players Association, of course. Wow that’s a long title…
Anyway, Demaurice Smith is also a big contributor to Liberal organizations and Politicians. In fact, he contributed 3,300 doll-hairs to Obama’s campaign. He had this to say about Limbaughs bid:
“This communication is more about what we stand for than the reality of our role in any franchise sale. While it’s true the subject matter was related [to Limbaugh's bid], I do understand that the NFL does not present ownership bids to me or the NFLPA. I encourage our players to express their views.”
So he is saying “I am opposed to this, so please players, speak up about how much this sucks”
“I have asked our players to embrace their roles not only in the game of football but also as players and partners in the business of the NFL,” said Smith in the e-mail. “They risk everything to play this game, they understand that risk and they live with that risk and its consequences for the rest of their life. We also know that there is an ugly part of history and we will not risk going backwards, giving up, giving in or lying down to it.
“Our men are strong and proud sons, fathers, spouses and I am proud when they stand up, understand this is their profession and speak with candor and blunt honesty about how they feel.”
Wow, those are strong words. So strong that it sounds like being a person who gets paid millions of dollars a year to play a sport, is relatable to someone in the military who gets deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan.
The NFL: it’s basically Iraq light. Or is Iraq, the NFL light?
But this quote confuses me and here is why: What in the blue hell does this have to do with Limbaugh? So what you are saying is if Limbaugh was a minority owner of a crap football team, race-relations in the NFL, nay, America; would go back decades? Sure that makes sense…
So he stand up and says something about Limbaugh (remember, he is a vocal opponent of the anointed one, Obama) even though he has no pull or say in the matter? It’s weird that someone who was on Obama’s transition team would speak out against this so vocally. Oh, did I forget to mention that Demaurice Smith was a part of Obama’s transition team? Sorry.
Joseph Ashby of the American Thinker summed it up nicely when he wrote:
“Smith’s gross conflict of interest and apparent political targeting of Obama’s top foe is a huge story. Unfortunately the media appears too blinded by their prejudice of Limbaugh to report on it.
To summarize, we know that a former Obama official and political ally — who was chosen by the NFLPA specifically for his political clout and connections to the highest rungs of power in government — directly attacked Limbaugh for the radio-talker’s political commentary.
Historically politicians have been prone to vindictive and petty behavior, but never in American history has someone had so much power to pummel his political opponents as President Obama. With control over banks, insurance companies, car companies, media (sports media included) and unions (like the NFL players union), Obama tentacles seem to penetrate into nearly every corner of the nation.”
Indeed
Let’s Talk about Al Sharpton now. We all know Al Sharpton. He is an impartial, unbiased, man-child, who wants nothing more than to target and eliminate racism at every level. That last sentence was completely inaccurate. In fact, an argument can be made that he and Jesse Jackson, are actually doing harm to race-relations. Sharpton is more racist than Limbaugh, and I’ll show you.
“I could watch you eat ALL-day-long”
In 1991, a Hasidic Jewish driver in Brooklyn driving in a motorcade, accidently veered off the road and killed a seven-year-old Gavin Cato who was black. Smelling racism, Sharpton swoops on scene telling people that this was a hate crime. At Gavin’s funeral, Sharpton railed against the Jews, calling them “Diamond merchants” and that they (the Jews) had “the blood of innocent babies” on their hands.
That’s not Anti-Semitic at all…
In 1998, Sharpton was ordered to pay 65,000 doll-hairs for defamation for falsely accusing a New York prosecutor of rape in the infamous Tawana Brawley case. If you are unfamiliar with that case, simply go to Google and search ‘Tawana Brawley’. You will be repulsed by what you find I guarantee.
Not to be outdone, Jesse Jackson once said of Barack Obama:
“Barack…he’s talking down to black people…telling niggers how to behave.”
Let’s not forget in 1984 when Jackson referred to Jews as “Hymie’s” and called New York City “Hymie-town”
“The itsy-bitsy spider went up the water spout…then a white guy came in and squashed him. It’s a hate crime! He’s anti-spider! What did that innocent spider do to provoke such hate?"
So who is the real racist here? The people who seek out racism in any avenue possible, have spewed racial slurs more than Limbaugh has? Or Limbaugh himself for saying that over-rated McNabb is indeed, over-rated? Give me a man-sized break over here!
Sharpton and Jackson have made a living off of stuff like this. Anytime they think something public is race-related, they come in on their steed and save the day. But they are the ones doing the real harm. Conservatives don’t make issue of race. That is because they see people as human beings, regardless of color. Conservatives don’t have a problem with Obama because he’s half black, they have a problem with him because of his socialist ideologies. They have a problem with the nanny state he is creating. They have a problem with freedoms he is trying to strip us of. Limbaugh isn’t a racist; he is simply a vocal conservative talk radio host who wants to buy an NFL team. It’s in his right. Owning an NFL team is a privilege but it can also be considered Limbaugh’s right to join the ranks. If he and his boy have more money than the other bidders, then why the hell not?
Limbaugh wouldn’t do any more damage than other minority owners have. Let’s talk about 2 minority owners of the Miami Dolphins.
“J-lo here, making being a sleezy hooker look easy since 1987”
The same day news broke that J-lo and Fergie became part owners of the Dolphins, Limbaugh was dropped from his ownership group seeking the Rams. Look at these lyrics (if you can call them that) from a song (if you can call it that) that J-lo performed with Ja Rule. Warning, this is some vulgar stuff:
What’s my motherf***in’ name? R-U-L-E
Blowin’ back on this Mary Jane, I’m analyzin’ the game
And the game done chose me
To bring pain to p***y n*ggaz and p***y hoes, it’s one in the same
That’s art like the thing my dog left in the backyard for me is a Picasso…
Fergie, do you have anything to present? Oh, you do? Lets see:
Overseas, yeah, we try to stop terrorism
But we still got terrorists here livin’
In the USA, the big CIA …
A war is goin’ on but the reason’s undercover
The truth is kept secret, it’s swept under the rug
No big deal, just accusing the CIA of being terrorists…
“It’s true, I did pee myself in front of everyone. I make being a drunken, slut-tastic, liberal, slob look like an art form”
Did I mention Fergie was so drunk one time at a show that she wet her pants mid-song in front of a live audience?
Oh yea, Serena Williams is also a part owner, who had this to say to a tennis official:
“ If I could, I would take this fu**ing ball and shove it down your fu**ing throat,”
That is all acceptable, but being a Conservative talk show host is so unacceptable, that you cannot be a minority owner of an NFL franchise. The double-standard is amazing. News organizations even went as far as falsifying quotes that Limbaugh supposedly uttered. Check out these videos if you please.
You get my point. Limbaugh being blocked is nothing more than tearing down the most popular Conservative out there today. I will leave you with this video of Representative Steve King (R-Iowa) straight tearing up NFL commissioner Goodell for his double-standards. It will bring you joy. Trust me.
Good day and thanks for reading. Please leave a comment and spread the word!
